The Children Are Hungry-Is Restrictive Caloric Intake The Answer?



There seems to be something wrong with the new USDA requirements for caloric intake for students. It does not make sense. To decrease obesity it is going to take more than reducing caloric intake. Obesity is prevalent for one reason: students are more sedatory than they were twenty or thirty years ago. 
Yes, students need to eat healthy but we do not provide them with lunches that will leave them hungry and would mostly lead them towards eating unhealthy snacks. 

Telling parents to pack snacks is not the answer. If we want to decrease obesity in this country we need to bring back recess, gym, let and require students to ACTIVELY play outdoors. 

This is not enough food for anyone: 
For an average high school student, that means two baked fish nuggets, a cup of vegetables, half a cup of mashed potatoes, one whole grain roll and 8 ounces of fat free milk . . .
It definitely would leave any active student hungry and for those that are not so active it would send a signal to the brain that you are trying to starve the body and you would actually cause your metabolism to SLOW DOWN. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Legacy-Do You Know What Your Imprint with Be from the Grave?

Manor College's Education LibGuide-Direct Links to Tabs

Reflection: How We Treat Each Other?